New Gig Company Laws, New Spending
Following California's Prop 22, which allowed gig companies like Uber and Lyft to classify workers as independent contractors with some added benefits but was recently ruled unconstitutional, these companies are now aggressively campaigning with significant funding to pass similar legislation in Massachusetts and other states that would guarantee drivers $18 an hour plus benefits while preserving work flexibility, amid ongoing disputes with worker rights groups over the true impact on gig workers.
The heat between gig companies and worker rights groups is intensifying. And the ad numbers show it.
Last year, businesses like Uber and Lyft contributed a record-breaking $200 million to the Prop 22 campaign in California, which allowed the companies to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.
As similar legislation gets closer to the ballot in Massachusetts, how much money will these companies shell out?
Gig companies take their fight out east
After California voters passed Prop 22 in November 2020, Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and other similar app-based services began to push for similar measures in other states.
Prop 22 allowed app-based transportation and delivery companies to classify gig workers as independent contractors, rather than employees. The compromise was that companies were exempt from standard employee taxes and benefits, but they needed to give contractors additional benefits.
Essentially, workers became classified as ‘independent contractors plus’. (The proposition has recently been deemed unconstitutional by a California superior court—so that leaves the future of the expensive legislation uncertain. Gig companies are already putting in an appeal.)
While the battle rages on in California, the same companies are now trying to pass similar legislation in Massachusetts and at least five other states.
The law in Massachusetts would ensure drivers receive $18 an hour for driving, plus additional benefits. Drivers get to maintain the flexibility and control of their hours, something that makes gig work distinct. The coalition of companies provided The New York Times this statement from a DoorDash courier, Pam Bennett:
“This is the best of both worlds. This measure will help every driver by preserving our ability to work whenever and however we want, and also give us access to brand-new benefits that will really help.”
On the other hand, critics say that the companies are deceiving the public and haven’t delivered the additional benefits like health insurance to drivers in California.
Uber, Lyft, and similar companies have been criticized for their treatment of workers and political funding, but they say they’re trying to find a legal way to ensure drivers can work the way they want to work.
No matter how you see it—it’s expensive.
The Coalition to Protect Workers’ Rights expects the gig services to spend around $100 million campaigning in Massachusetts.
We are still at the beginning of defining what the gig economy should and shouldn’t be. What type of advertising spending are we seeing from these companies?
MediaRadar Insights
Uber, Lyft, Instacart, GrubHub, and DoorDash spent $454 million from January – August this year, which is a 41% increase year-over-year.
Compared to 2019, spending increased 73%.
Spend increased significantly in July and August (123% and 66% year-over-year respectively) when the Massachusetts ballot measure gained national attention.
UberEats, GrubHub, and DoorDash make up the largest amount of spending from this category this year, accounting for 80% of all the category’s spend in 2021.
Though their outside efforts to lobby for these measures are significant, none of the creative from these companies focuses specifically on workers’ benefits. Winning over customers and the affinity of voters might be a key way for these companies to achieve their goals.
For more updates like this, stay tuned. Subscribe to our blog for more updates on coronavirus and its mark on the economy.
Related
2023 MediaRadar Prediction: Agriculture Advertisers Make it Rain on Traditional Ad Formats
In 2022, agriculture advertisers increased their ad spending by 7% to over $153 million, predominantly investing 70% in traditional print (48%) and TV (22%) formats despite digital media's rise, reflecting the industry's reliance on direct selling and traditional business models, with notable spending surges in Q1 and Q3 but declines later in the year, a pattern expected to continue into 2023.
2023 MediaRadar Prediction: Home Goods Advertisers Aren’t Bursting Their Ad Strategies
In 2022, despite a declining housing market and economic uncertainty, home goods advertisers increased their spending modestly by 5% to over $6 billion, with a surprising majority (over 60%) allocated to traditional ad formats like TV and print, reflecting a broader industry trend of reviving traditional media as a strategic response to digital saturation and the impending loss of third-party cookies, a pattern expected to continue into 2023.
Q4 2023 12 for ‘24 - Retail Media Networks
In 2023, despite economic challenges, retail media advertising experienced significant growth—rising 22% year-over-year to $5.09 billion through November—driven by retailers developing robust ad platforms that offer highly targeted shopper audiences and clear ROI, with spending increasing quarterly across over 20 major retail media networks and expected to surge further during the holiday season.
Firearms & Accessories Advertising On the Rise in the US
In the first half of 2022, firearms and accessories advertisers in the US increased their spending by 21% year-over-year to over $67 million, with significant investments not only in promoting guns but also in body armor, driven by rising demand, safety concerns, and increased police funding despite ongoing calls for gun reform.
Restaurant Supply Chains are Unstable: B2B and B2C Spending are Going Different Directions
Restaurants are facing significant supply chain instability as B2B food suppliers struggle with ingredient shortages and processing plant bottlenecks—particularly in meat processing—leading to delivery delays, rising prices, and challenges for smaller operators, all while consumer demand for dining out surges and advertising budgets shrink.
YouTube Advertisers to Watch: Which Brands Spent More Than $100mm in 2021?
In 2021, fourteen companies collectively spent nearly $2.7 billion on YouTube ads, with Amazon notably increasing its YouTube ad investment by 124% year-over-year to over $100 million, allocating 47% of its ad budget to retail products, 30% to media and entertainment, and significant portions to tech and various content categories such as music and gaming.